Which philosophical or ethical questions does Stevenson raise about justice?

Bryan Stevenson raises profound philosophical and ethical questions about justice throughout "Just Mercy," particularly focusing on the morality of punishment, the possibility of redemption, and the responsibilities of society towards its most vulnerable members. This aspect is fundamental to his argument that true justice is not only about punishment but also about understanding the roots of crime, the circumstances surrounding offenders, and the chances for rehabilitation.

Stevenson explores how concepts like mercy and compassion can guide a more humane approach to justice, challenging the traditional punitive systems that often fail to take into account the complexities of individual circumstances. By emphasizing the need for a justice system that promotes healing and acknowledges the potential for redemption rather than merely serving as a means of retribution, Stevenson advocates for a legal system that reflects our shared humanity and responsibility towards one another.

The other choices touch on aspects of justice but do not encompass the broader ethical implications that Stevenson articulates regarding morality, societal values, and the role of mercy in the justice system.